RIGOR · Stage 1 · Premarket evidence

The evidence FDA actually accepted.

Every parsed AI/ML 510(k) summary as structured, source-quoted fields — validation design, endpoints, predicate chains — connected to what happened after clearance and how devices got paid.

Presence rates, never pooled.Every figure below is “reported in X of Y audited devices.” Performance values are never averaged across devices — each stays with its analysis unit, task, and a verbatim FDA quote. A device we haven’t parsed yet is queue, never “FDA accepted thin evidence.”

What evidence did FDA accept for devices like yours?

Keyword-based retrieval over the parsed corpus (names, algorithm descriptions, endpoints, source quotes) — not semantic search. Try: · ·

Corpus coverage — Neurology

0 of 66clearances parsed, most-recent-first · 64 in parse queue · latest decision 2026-03-26

The hatched segment is our parse queue, not device data. Queued devices never count in any rate below — every denominator is audited devices only.

What the audited corpus reports

Evidence reporting

Any sensitivity metric0 of 2

Canonicalized — includes per-finding sensitivities, not just the summary's top-line slot.

Sensitivity and specificity0 of 2
Any performance metric1 of 2
Clinical (not bench-only) data2 of 2
Subgroup / demographic reporting1 of 2
Predetermined Change Control Plan0 of 2

“Not reported” is a real finding about what FDA accepted — the summary was audited and does not state it.

Metric presence (canonicalized)

  • accuracy1 of 2

Presence only — values are never pooled or averaged across devices. Each measurement lives on its device's page with its analysis unit and verbatim quote.

Median predicate age: 8.9y across 3 of 4 predicate edges (75% datable, dates backfilled from openFDA) — how old each cited predicate was when the child device cleared.

One corpus, whole lifecycle

Every device page connects all four stages: clearance → evidence → postmarket → payment. Stages without data render as “not yet tracked”, never as empty or fabricated.

Machine access

The same retrieval over MCP — 12 tools across the lifecycle
curl -s https://radar.healthai.com/api/mcp \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/call",
       "params":{"name":"evidence_search",
                 "arguments":{"panel":"Radiology","reports_any_sensitivity_metric":true}}}'

device_evidence_lookup, evidence_search, predicate_chain, device_postmarket_lookup, reimbursement_lookup, and more. Every extracted field carries a source quote and page — descriptive only, never a compliance judgment.

Connect the MCP endpoint

Follow the corpus as it grows

New parses land weekly, most-recent-first. Get notified as coverage expands and presence rates shift — and be first on the client digest when it ships.

RIGOR™ Precedent — the premarket evidence layer, by Health AI. Built on public FDA data (openFDA, accessdata.fda.gov); descriptive decision-support, not regulatory advice or consulting.