Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound System
K252557Philips Ultrasound, LLC · cleared 2025-12-22 · product code IYN · Radiology
Premarket evidence — what FDA accepted
source quote (p.7)
“The Philips Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound System (Lumify) is a mobile, durable, and reusable, software-controlled medical device, which is intended to acquire high-resolution ultrasound data and to display the data in B mode (2D), Pulsed Wave Doppler, Color Doppler, Combined (B+ Color), and M modes.”
source quote (p.6)
“It utilizes machine learning algorithms trained on a large dataset of expert-annotated lung ultrasound images to ensure accurate analysis.”
Validation studies (2)
Retrospective clinical
sample size not stated
endpoints: automated classification of lung view quality and pleural line appearance during clinical LUS examinations; algorithm agreement with ground truth labels for binary classification of (1) Adequate versus Poor lung view quality, and (2) Normal versus Irregular pleural line appearance
Reader study (MRMC)
sample size not stated
endpoints: evaluate the performance of the subject device in a simulated clinical setting
Reported performance (4 observations)
source quote (p.12)
“The Lung View Quality algorithm demonstrated substantial agreement with ground truth for binary classification of Adequate vs. Poor views, achieving 87.9% concordance, Cohen’s kappa of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61–0.72), and PABAK of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72–0.80).”
source quote (p.12)
“The Lung View Quality algorithm demonstrated substantial agreement with ground truth for binary classification of Adequate vs. Poor views, achieving 87.9% concordance, Cohen’s kappa of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61–0.72), and PABAK of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72–0.80).”
source quote (p.12)
“The Pleural Line algorithm showed substantial agreement with ground truth for binary classification of Normal versus Irregular pleural line, achieving 85.6% concordance, Cohen’s kappa of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.61–0.71), and PABAK of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67–0.76).”
source quote (p.12)
“The Pleural Line algorithm showed substantial agreement with ground truth for binary classification of Normal versus Irregular pleural line, achieving 85.6% concordance, Cohen’s kappa of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.61–0.71), and PABAK of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67–0.76).”
Each value carries its own analysis unit and task — never compare or pool across devices. Source: 510(k) summary PDF.
Predicate network
Postmarket — what happened after clearance
- recall_reason_pattern
Software/algorithm-related recall in product code IYN (Philips Ultrasound, LLC, initiated 2025-10-31): "Ultrasound system compatibility issues with Apple devices running iOS 18 may cause a failure to perform live imagining." Recalling firm matches this device's applicant.
first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:97843
- recall_reason_pattern
Software/algorithm-related recall in product code IYN (GE Medical Systems, LLC, initiated 2025-09-18): "The Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter (UGAP) measurement data may display inaccurate values representing liver steatosis. This could potentially lead to inappropriate clinica" Recalling firm is another firm in the same product code.
first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:97726
- recall_reason_pattern
Software/algorithm-related recall in product code IYN (GE Medical Systems China Co., Ltd. Dev. Zone National Hi-Tech; No., initiated 2025-05-16): "GE HealthCare has become aware that the Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW) measurement data feature on the Versana Premier R3 and LOGIQ F R3 series ultrasound systems can display previou" Recalling firm is another firm in the same product code.
first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:96992
- recall_reason_pattern
Software/algorithm-related recall in product code IYN (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., initiated 2024-08-15): "If ultrasound systems with software, are changed from factory default to : 1) Milliliters per second (ml/sec, mL/sec) or 2) Milliliters per minute (ml/min, mL/min); then systems wi" Recalling firm is another firm in the same product code.
first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:95254
Recall and MAUDE counts are product-code-level (reports aren't reliably attributable to one device). Signals are descriptive observables with sources — never a judgment that the device is unsafe or drifting. Snapshot 2026-07-08.
Reimbursement — how devices like this got paid
Not yet tracked — no payment pathway indexed for this clearance (the reimbursement corpus is a growing seed set).