AISAP Cardio V1.0
K234141Aisap · cleared 2024-08-01 · product code POK · Radiology
Premarket evidence — what FDA accepted
source quote (p.7)
“Software as a medical device (SaMD)”
source quote (p.5)
“AISAP CARDIO V1.0 uses machine learning NN (neural network) models trained to recognize patterns and make decisions. AISAP CARDIO V1.0 contains classification models which identify categories within data, regression models which predict numerical values, and instance segmentation models that detect and segment objects within images.”
source quote (p.8)
“Risk assessment, performance, and cybersecurity of AISAP CARDIO V1.0 have been evaluated and verified in accordance with pre-defined software specifications and applicable performance standards through software verification testing.”
Validation studies (4)
Standalone
n=200 cases
endpoints: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF); IVC maximal diameter; Left atrium (LA) area; Right atrium (RA) area; LV end diastolic diameter; Right ventricle (RV) fractional area change (FAC); Aortic root diameter
standards: American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines
Standalone
n=329 cases
endpoints: Mitral Regurgitation (MR); Aortic Stenosis (AS); Aortic Regurgitation (AR); Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR)
Reader study (MRMC)
n=260 cases
endpoints: AUCaided; AUCunaided; Kappa agreement; Accuracy agreement
Bench
n=2,000 other
endpoints: Correct identification of the video clip view classification
Reported performance (36 observations)
source quote (p.10)
“95.3% (90.5,98.9)”
source quote (p.10)
“90.2% (86.3,93.9)”
source quote (p.10)
“0.975 (0.960,0.987)”
source quote (p.10)
“0.879 (0.852,0.906)”
source quote (p.10)
“86.5% (76.2,95.7)”
source quote (p.10)
“94.5% (91.3,97.3)”
source quote (p.10)
“0.969 (0.950,0.984)”
source quote (p.10)
“0.865 (0.825,0.901)”
source quote (p.10)
“96.5% (91.3,100.0)”
source quote (p.10)
“97.0% (94.9,98.9)”
source quote (p.10)
“0.993 (0.986,0.999)”
source quote (p.10)
“0.913 (0.892,0.932)”
source quote (p.10)
“93.5% (86.9,98.5)”
source quote (p.10)
“89.3% (85.2,93.1)”
source quote (p.10)
“0.973 (0.955,0.987)”
source quote (p.10)
“0.879 (0.854,0.905)”
source quote (p.11)
“0.881 (0.872,0.890)”
source quote (p.11)
“73.6% (71.9%,75.2%)”
source quote (p.11)
“0.756 (0.737,0.774)”
source quote (p.11)
“61.6% (59.8%,63.4%)”
source quote (p.11)
“0.881 (0.871,0.892)”
source quote (p.11)
“75.3% (73.6%,77.0%)”
source quote (p.11)
“0.765 (0.747,0.783)”
source quote (p.11)
“64.1% (62.2%,65.9%)”
source quote (p.11)
“0.913 (0.905,0.921)”
source quote (p.11)
“80.6% (79.1%,82.1%)”
source quote (p.11)
“0.815 (0.798,0.831)”
source quote (p.11)
“71.7% (70.0%,73.3%)”
source quote (p.11)
“0.850 (0.834,0.864)”
source quote (p.11)
“74.7% (73.0%,76.3%)”
source quote (p.11)
“0.792 (0.773,0.809)”
source quote (p.11)
“69.8% (68.1%,71.6%)”
source quote (p.12)
“PLAX - 500/500”
source quote (p.12)
“PSAX - 496/500”
source quote (p.12)
“A4C - 495/500”
source quote (p.12)
“SC IVC - 494/500”
Each value carries its own analysis unit and task — never compare or pool across devices. Source: 510(k) summary PDF.
Predicate network
Postmarket — what happened after clearance
Recall and MAUDE counts are product-code-level (reports aren't reliably attributable to one device). Signals are descriptive observables with sources — never a judgment that the device is unsafe or drifting. Snapshot 2026-07-08.
Reimbursement — how devices like this got paid
Not yet tracked — no payment pathway indexed for this clearance (the reimbursement corpus is a growing seed set).