Overjet Caries Assist-Pediatric

K233738

Overjet, Inc · cleared 2024-03-04 · product code MYN · Radiology

Premarket evidence — what FDA accepted

Device typesamd
source quote (p.4)
OCA-Ped is a software-only device which operates in three layers: a Network Layer, a Presentation Layer, and a Decision Layer.
AlgorithmMachine Learning model
source quote (p.4)
Images are pulled in from a clinic/dental office, and the Machine Learning model creates predictions in the Decision Layer and results are pushed to the dashboard, which are in the Presentation Layer.
Adaptive (vs locked)FDA source did not state this
PCCPFDA source did not state this
Cybersecurity addressedFDA source did not state this

Validation studies (2)

Reader study (MRMC)

n=636 cases

endpoints: AUC of the WAFROC

standards: Computer-Assisted Detection Devices Applied to Radiology Images and Radiology Device Data - Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions, Clinical Performance Assessment: Considerations for Computer-Assisted Detection Devices Applied to Radiology Images and Radiology Device Data in Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions

Standalone

n=1,190 images

endpoints: Tooth level standalone sensitivity; Tooth Level standalone specificity; Standalone Dice

standards: Computer-Assisted Detection Devices Applied to Radiology Images and Radiology Device Data - Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions, Clinical Performance Assessment: Considerations for Computer-Assisted Detection Devices Applied to Radiology Images and Radiology Device Data in Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions

Reported performance (8 observations)

sensitivity0.839CI 0.816, 0.860
source quote (p.6)
Tooth level standalone sensitivity was 83.9%, 95% CI's (0.816, 0.860).
specificity0.975CI 0.971, 0.979
source quote (p.6)
Tooth Level standalone specificity was 97.5%, 95% CI's (0.971, 0.979).
diceas written: “Standalone Dice0.79CI 0.784, 0.797
source quote (p.6)
Standalone Dice was a mean of 79.0%, 95% CI's (0.784, 0.797).
sensitivityas written: “Carestream Tooth Level Standalone Sensitivity0.87CI 0.832, 0.900
source quote (p.6)
Carestream 0.870 (0.832, 0.900)
sensitivityas written: “Dexis Tooth Level Standalone Sensitivity0.872CI 0.841, 0.902
source quote (p.6)
Dexis 0.872 (0.841, 0.902)
sensitivityas written: “E2V Tooth Level Standalone Sensitivity0.761CI 0.713, 0.806
source quote (p.6)
E2V 0.761 (0.713, 0.806)
sensitivityas written: “Gendex Tooth Level Standalone Sensitivity0.843CI 0.800, 0.882
source quote (p.6)
Gendex 0.843 (0.800, 0.882)
sensitivityas written: “Schick Tooth Level Standalone Sensitivity0.844CI 0.805, 0.878
source quote (p.6)
Schick 0.844 (0.805, 0.878)

Each value carries its own analysis unit and task — never compare or pool across devices. Source: 510(k) summary PDF.

Predicate network

Postmarket — what happened after clearance

0
recalls in product code, 24mo
0
MAUDE reports in code, 12mo
-100%
vs code's own 3-yr baseline
0
drift signals on this device

Recall and MAUDE counts are product-code-level (reports aren't reliably attributable to one device). Signals are descriptive observables with sources — never a judgment that the device is unsafe or drifting. Snapshot 2026-07-08.

Reimbursement — how devices like this got paid

Not yet tracked — no payment pathway indexed for this clearance (the reimbursement corpus is a growing seed set).

RIGOR™ Precedent · public FDA/CMS data · descriptive decision-support, not regulatory or reimbursement advice. Share this page: radar.healthai.com/precedent/device/K233738