Overjet Charting Assist

K233590

Overjet, Inc · cleared 2024-02-23 · product code QIH · Radiology

Premarket evidence — what FDA accepted

Device typesamd
source quote (p.4)
Overjet Charting Assist is a Medical Image Management and Processing System (MIMPS) device aimed to assist dental professionals in detecting dental structures and producing dental charting data based on interpretation of 2D dental radiographs.
AlgorithmAI based image analysis
source quote (p.5)
Both devices utilize AI based image analysis.
Adaptive (vs locked)FDA source did not state this
PCCPFDA source did not state this
Cybersecurity addressedFDA source did not state this

Validation studies (1)

Retrospective clinical

n=634 images · 44 site(s)

endpoints: tooth level sensitivity of past restorative treatment; dental tooth anatomy; tooth level sensitivity (overall classification accuracy) of tooth numbering

Reported performance (9 observations)

sensitivityas written: “Tooth level standalone sensitivity for past restorative structures0.883CI (86.6%, 90.1%)
source quote (p.7)
Tooth level standalone sensitivity for past restorative structures was 88.3% with 95% CI's of (86.6%, 90.1%).
sensitivityas written: “Tooth Level standalone sensitivity for dental tooth anatomy (enamel/pulp)0.959CI (95.1%, 96.5%)
source quote (p.7)
Tooth Level standalone sensitivity for dental tooth anatomy (enamel/pulp) was 95.9% with 95% CI's of (95.1%, 96.5%).
sensitivityas written: “Tooth Level standalone sensitivity (Overall Classification Accuracy) for dental tooth numbering0.988CI (98.4%, 99.1%)
source quote (p.7)
Tooth Level standalone sensitivity (Overall Classification Accuracy) for dental tooth numbering was 98.8% with 95% CI's of (98.4%, 99.1%).
diceas written: “Dice for Dental Tooth Anatomy0.836CI (0.832, 0.842)
source quote (p.7)
Dice for Dental Tooth Anatomy resulted in a Mean Std. Dev. 0.836 (0.098) with 95% CI's (0.832, 0.842).
diceas written: “Dice for Past Restorative Structures0.918CI (0.914, 0.923)
source quote (p.7)
Dice for Past Restorative Structures resulted in a Mean Std. Dev. 0.918 (0.078) with 95% CI's (0.914, 0.923).
ppvas written: “PPV for dental tooth anatomy at the tooth level0.967CI (0.960, 0.973)
source quote (p.7)
PPV for dental tooth anatomy at the tooth level was 0.967 with 95% CI's of (0.960, 0.973)
npvas written: “NPV for dental tooth anatomy at the tooth level0.71CI (0.672, 0.745)
source quote (p.7)
NPV for dental tooth anatomy at the tooth level was 0.710 with 95% CI's of (0.672, 0.745)
ppvas written: “PPV for past restorative structures at the tooth level0.958CI (0.948, 0.967)
source quote (p.7)
PPV for past restorative structures at the tooth level was 0.958 with 95% CI's of (0.948, 0.967)
npvas written: “NPV for past restorative structures at the tooth level0.945CI (0.935, 0.954)
source quote (p.7)
NPV for past restorative structures at the tooth level was 0.945 with 95% CI's of (0.935, 0.954)

Each value carries its own analysis unit and task — never compare or pool across devices. Source: 510(k) summary PDF.

Predicate network

Postmarket — what happened after clearance

0
recalls in product code, 24mo
3
MAUDE reports in code, 12mo
vs code's own 3-yr baseline
1
drift signals on this device
  • re_clearance

    The FDA AI/ML device list shows a newer 510(k) K241684 (decision 2024-08-27) from Overjet, Inc for a matching device line ("Overjet Charting Assist") — a new clearance for the same line is a change event.

    first seen 2026-07-08 · k_number:K241684

Recall and MAUDE counts are product-code-level (reports aren't reliably attributable to one device). Signals are descriptive observables with sources — never a judgment that the device is unsafe or drifting. Snapshot 2026-07-08.

Reimbursement — how devices like this got paid

Not yet tracked — no payment pathway indexed for this clearance (the reimbursement corpus is a growing seed set).

RIGOR™ Precedent · public FDA/CMS data · descriptive decision-support, not regulatory or reimbursement advice. Share this page: radar.healthai.com/precedent/device/K233590