inHEART Models
K231683inHEART, SAS · cleared 2024-02-29 · product code QIH · Radiology
Premarket evidence — what FDA accepted
source quote (p.5)
“inHEART MODELS is a suite of medical image processing software tools that enables 3D visualization and analysis of anatomical structures. This software suite is composed of three software as a medical device components:”
source quote (p.5)
“This software module uses a machine-learning based approach with the following characteristics: Training dataset: 796 cases (3D CT original images and the segmentation masks) from previously manually performed segmentations (time period 2018-2022); origins of the data are public and private clinical and hospital institutions located in US (40%) and Europe (60%). Training process: Machine learning algorithm (UNet) is trained applying data augmentation (including patch mirroring) and regularization (including Instance Normalization, Dropout, Data Augmentation, Weight Initialization, Leaky ReLU Activation) methods. Loss functions (soft dice loss and binary cross entropy) and optimization methods (stochastic gradient descent) are used during learning over a fixed number of 1000 epochs, each consisting of 250 iterations with a batch size of 2.”
source quote (p.5)
“Machine learning algorithm (UNet) is trained applying data augmentation (including patch mirroring) and regularization (including Instance Normalization, Dropout, Data Augmentation, Weight Initialization, Leaky ReLU Activation) methods. Loss functions (soft dice loss and binary cross entropy) and optimization methods (stochastic gradient descent) are used during learning over a fixed number of 1000 epochs, each consisting of 250 iterations with a batch size of 2.”
source quote (p.6)
“IEC 81001-5-1 Edition 1.0 2021-12, Health software and health IT systems safety, effectiveness and security – Part 5-1 Security – Activities in the product life cycle”
Validation studies (1)
Retrospective clinical
n=100 cases
endpoints: Dice coefficient (>0.9 for acceptance without manual correction); Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD) (<5mm for acceptance without manual correction); volumetric analysis of the produced model (<20 mL for acceptance without manual correction, <15mL absolute and <10% relative after correction for the main chambers)
standards: ISO, 14971 Third Edition 2019-12, ISO, 15223-1 Third Edition 2016-11-01, IEC, 62304 Edition 1.1 2015-06, IEC, 62366-1 Edition 1.1 2020-06, IEC, /TR 80002-1 Edition 1.0 2009-09, IEC, 82304-1 Edition 1.0 2016-10, IEC 81001-5-1 Edition 1.0 2021-12
Reported performance (1 observation)
source quote (p.9)
“Average Dice score is 0.94”
Each value carries its own analysis unit and task — never compare or pool across devices. Source: 510(k) summary PDF.
Predicate network
Postmarket — what happened after clearance
Recall and MAUDE counts are product-code-level (reports aren't reliably attributable to one device). Signals are descriptive observables with sources — never a judgment that the device is unsafe or drifting. Snapshot 2026-07-08.
Reimbursement — how devices like this got paid
Not yet tracked — no payment pathway indexed for this clearance (the reimbursement corpus is a growing seed set).