Lung-CAD
K223811Imagen Technologies, Inc · cleared 2023-09-13 · product code MYN · Radiology
Premarket evidence — what FDA accepted
source quote (p.3)
“Lung-CAD is a computer-assisted detection (CADe) software device that analyzes chest radiograph studies for interstitial thickening.”
source quote (p.3)
“The device uses a deep learning algorithm to identify regions of interest (ROIs) with interstitial thickening and produces boxes around the ROIs.”
source quote (p.7)
“HIPAA Compliant”
Validation studies (2)
Standalone
n=5,000 cases
endpoints: sensitivity; specificity; Area Under the Curve (AUC)
standards: FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, “Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices."
Reader study (MRMC)
n=244 cases
endpoints: accuracy of readers aided by Lung-CAD superior to unaided readers as determined by case-level Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Reported performance (6 observations)
source quote (p.8)
“Lung-CAD detects ROIs with high sensitivity (0.913; 95% Wilson's Confidence Interval: 0.850, 0.951)”
source quote (p.8)
“high specificity (0.866; 95% Wilson's Confidence Interval: 0.856, 0.875)”
source quote (p.8)
“high Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (0.961, 95% Bootstrap Confidence Interval: 0.948, 0.972)”
source quote (p.9)
“Positive Predictive Value 0.150 (0.126, 0.177)”
source quote (p.9)
“Negative Predictive Value 0.997 (0.995, 0.999)”
source quote (p.10)
“Reader AUC improvement for interstitial thickening was 0.0797 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.0797, 0.0798).”
Each value carries its own analysis unit and task — never compare or pool across devices. Source: 510(k) summary PDF.
Predicate network
Postmarket — what happened after clearance
- re_clearance
The FDA AI/ML device list shows a newer 510(k) K230085 (decision 2023-10-03) from Imagen Technologies, Inc for a matching device line ("Lung-CAD") — a new clearance for the same line is a change event.
first seen 2026-07-08 · k_number:K230085
Recall and MAUDE counts are product-code-level (reports aren't reliably attributable to one device). Signals are descriptive observables with sources — never a judgment that the device is unsafe or drifting. Snapshot 2026-07-08.
Reimbursement — how devices like this got paid
Not yet tracked — no payment pathway indexed for this clearance (the reimbursement corpus is a growing seed set).