Advanced Algorithms for Treatment Management Applications (AATMA)

K212218

Elekta Solutions AB · cleared 2021-10-25 · product code QKB · Radiology

Premarket evidence — what FDA accepted

Device typesamd
source quote (p.3)
AATMA™ is a medical image processing library intended to produce derived data sets for use as input into radiation therapy treatment planning systems or other intermediate pre-treatment-planning applications. AATMA™ does not provide a user interface and is designed to be accessed through its application programming interface (API) by other devices. The data sets created by AATMA™ must be reviewed and validated by a qualified healthcare professional prior to clinical use.
Algorithmmachine-learning convolutional neural networks
source quote (p.4)
The auto-segmentation algorithm in AATMA™ is based on machine-learning convolutional neural networks and includes pre-trained models that will be used to automatically segment image sets.
Adaptive (vs locked)No
source quote (p.4)
The available models have been pre-trained on specific datasets that exhibit similar characteristics (e.g., body site and imaging modality).
PCCPFDA source did not state this
Cybersecurity addressedFDA source did not state this

Validation studies (2)

Retrospective clinical

n=13 images

endpoints: DICE coefficient

standards: FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices.", CFR 21 Part 820, DICOM standard

Retrospective clinical

n=20 images

endpoints: DICE coefficient

standards: FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices.", CFR 21 Part 820, DICOM standard

Reported performance (2 observations)

diceas written: “average DICE coefficient over all structures (Head & Neck model)0.84
source quote (p.6)
A different set of six(6) patient CT image sets with expert contours were chosen for verification and the average DICE coefficient over all structures was determined to be 0.84 which met the defined acceptance criteria.
diceas written: “average DICE coefficient over all structures (Male Pelvis model)0.93
source quote (p.6)
A different set of five (5) patient CT image sets with expert contours were chosen for verification and the average DICE coefficient over all structures was determined to be 0.93 which met the defined acceptance criteria.

Each value carries its own analysis unit and task — never compare or pool across devices. Source: 510(k) summary PDF.

Predicate network

Postmarket — what happened after clearance

0
recalls in product code, 24mo
0
MAUDE reports in code, 12mo
vs code's own 3-yr baseline
0
drift signals on this device

Recall and MAUDE counts are product-code-level (reports aren't reliably attributable to one device). Signals are descriptive observables with sources — never a judgment that the device is unsafe or drifting. Snapshot 2026-07-08.

Reimbursement — how devices like this got paid

Not yet tracked — no payment pathway indexed for this clearance (the reimbursement corpus is a growing seed set).

RIGOR™ Precedent · public FDA/CMS data · descriptive decision-support, not regulatory or reimbursement advice. Share this page: radar.healthai.com/precedent/device/K212218